The Postal Service's fundamental goal is to provide mailers a highly consistent two-day
delivery service. The redesign project for Priority Mail is the first time the Postal Service has
undertaken to operate dedicated facilities for a single class of mail since the BMC network was
constructed in the 60s. (The BMCs were originally intended for fourth class mail only.) In addition,
the dedicated ground transportation is planned to operate as an integrated, optimized network. In
concept, this is different from existing Postal Service ground transportation, which consists of a large
number of contracts with independent operators. In theory, a single optimized network will guarantee
better service while controlling cost. Whether the Postal Service will subcontract the entire network to
a single operator, or attempt either to coordinate or operate the network itself, has not yet been
determined.
Before the Governors met, APMU sent a letter to the Board recognizing that Priority Mail
service needs improvement and commending the redesign project generally, while raising several
concerns. Specific concerns raised include: (i) the threat that processing of Priority Mail through
dedicated facilities will eliminate all overnight service; (ii) the potential for cost increases arising from
dedicated ground transportation service; (iii) the potential for increased cost arising from idle personnel
in dedicated facilities; (iv) the threat that plant-loaded Priority Mail shipments will be diverted from
direct entry at airport facilities and instead be channeled through the new, dedicated Priority Mail
facilities, thereby introducing unnecessary dispatch delays; and (v) the need to have track and trace
capabilities with the flexibility to be sited where Priority Mail is plant-loaded.
David Shinnebarger New Product Manager for Priority Mail
Loren Smith, the Postal Service's Senior Vice President/Chief Marketing Officer, appears to
be fond of change. "New Faces for 1996" would aptly describe what's now playing at the Expedited
Services Group. Here's the new line-up.
David Shinnebarger has been designated the new Product Manager for Priority Mail, filling
the vacancy created when Bob Michelson moved over to International Mail. Dave will also be
responsible for Express Mail and parcels. Dave comes from the new products group in marketing, and
reports to John Wargo. Dave's telephone number is (202) 268-2272.
Tony Gallo, long-time Assistant Product Manager and former Acting Product Manager for
Priority Mail, well-known to APMU members, will follow Bob Michelson to International Mail. Tony
will assume his new position in January. At press time, the new Assistant Product Manager for Priority
Mail had not been identified, but an announcement is expected soon.
Tom Philson, another familiar face, is also leaving the Expedited Services Group and moving
to International Mail.
Last of a dying breed? Dave Shinnebarger may be the last living specimen of a vanishing
postal species. The Product Manager positions for First, second, and third class mail have all been
abolished. Remaining in the Expedited Services Group, at least for the time being, are Jeff Burger,
Jamie McHenry, and Mel Schneider.
Track and Trace Plans
The Postal Service is conducting a research and development project on track and trace for
Priority Mail and ground parcels. Briefly, the track and trace project, although independent of the
Priority Mail redesign effort, is on a roughly parallel timetable, and some of the initial track and trace
equipment is planned to be installed in the new, dedicated Priority Mail facilities. The proposal for a
Phase I test effort will be presented to the Board of Governors for review and approval in February.
Phase I is expected to last about one year, to be followed by a nationwide roll-out. During the initial
testing period, confirmation will be available for packages entered at key areas along the eastern
Seaboard and destinating in Florida. The Postal Service will be looking for Priority Mail users to
participate in the tracking tests.
Outlook for Next Rate Case
As a result of the rate increase in January, the Postal Service concluded the 1995 fiscal year
(ending September 30) with a widely-publicized surplus of $1.8 billion. The entire surplus reportedly
will be used to reduce the Postal Service's negative equity, and will not be available to defray operating
deficits or prolong the existing rates.
The Postal Service foresees a surplus of $500-$700 million for fiscal year 1996. Thus, last
year's $1.8 billion surplus is diminishing at an annual rate of $1.1 to $1.3 billion. Extrapolating this
diminution to fiscal years 1997 and 1998, the Postal Service would be looking at deficits of $600 and
$1,800 million, respectively, unless another rate increase is imposed. Since it takes approximately one
year to process a request for higher rates, the Postal Service will probably need to file for an increase
sometime between August 1996 and March 1997. The good news is that the rates currently in effect
appear likely to hold for 2.5 to 3 years, which is somewhat longer than expected when the last rate case
was filed.
Collective Bargaining Agreements
The Postal Service's contracts with the letter carriers (NALC), clerks and mailhandlers
(APWU) and rural carriers were arrived at in August, October, and November, respectively. The
contracts with NALC and APWU expire in 1998 (3 years), and the contract with rural carriers expires
in 1999 (4 years). Under the new agreements, the unions retained their semi-annual COLA, plus wage
increases of approximately 2 percent.
APMU Meeting at National Postal Forum
The Association of Priority Mail Users will host an industry session at the next National Postal
Forum, scheduled for late April 1996 in Anaheim, California. The APMU leadership is putting
together a plan for an interesting and fun presentation. Also being planned for Anaheim is a luncheon
meeting for members and any persons interested in learning more about our association.
1996 APMU Activities